I wanted to say that the probability of a given graph looking like a joint if you've smoked zero is also zero; However, there would still be plotpints on the x-axis.
The joint conclusion seems to be that only those who smoke joints join in the plot that joint plots plot out to look like joints.
funny comic- very unexpected!
Leave a comment
Profile pictures are tied to your email address and can
be set up at Gravatar.
Click here for recent comments.
(Note: You must have javascript enabled to leave comments, otherwise you will get a comment submission error.)
If you make a mistake or the comment doesn't show up properly, email me and I'll gladly fix it :-).
Hello my fellow math geeks. My name is Mike and I am the creator
of Spiked Math Comics, a math comic dedicated to humor, educate
and entertain the geek in you. Beware though, there might be some
math involved :D
This comic is brought to you by the letter 3, which is how many joints I've smoked today!
I thought I was the only one in the world who's heard the "Kermit and Big Bird on weed" parody.
you are not alone! that parody still makes me laugh.
Mike, are you trying to tell us to smoke joints?
...
Well, if that's what it takes to become a better math geek, I guess I'll do it :-)
it makes mindblowing theorems even more mindblowing
=D
This reminds me of the "Clerks" cartoon. In episode one, Jay seems to think everything looks like a bong.
Why are there no data points for people who have spoked zero joints? Does this mean that everyone smokes joints or that all your friends are stoners?
I wanted to say that the probability of a given graph looking like a joint if you've smoked zero is also zero; However, there would still be plotpints on the x-axis.
This is the reference implementation of the self-referencial joke.
The joint conclusion seems to be that only those who smoke joints join in the plot that joint plots plot out to look like joints.
funny comic- very unexpected!