Spiked Math Games  // Math Fail Blog  // Gauss Facts  // Spiked Math Forums  // Spiked Math Comics

                                     

227

Pranks - April 26, 2010
Rating: 3.6/5 (47 votes cast)
  • Currently 3.6/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Spiked Math Comic - Pranks



Subscribe to feed             





home     info     archive     contact     rss

Google+ Page   //   Facebook Page   //   Twitter Page


15 Comments

I think one of the worst pranks from mathematicians is their sly placement of the four colors problem, in layman's terms, in puzzle books and websites, presenting it as a solvable problem. Needless to say, thousands of drawings later, I declared it impossible (proof by exhaustion).

But it is solvable. And maybe someone will look at it just the right way and come up with an elemental proof...

That's the best thing about Math, don't you know. In other fields, like physics, once something is solved (for example, simple mechanics like on a billiards table), it's solved, and time to move on.

In math, nothing is ever that far from new discoveries and new insights, when someone looks at an old, simple thing with new eyes. or, as the Ross Mathematics Program taught us, "Think deeply of simple things." (http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/ross/studentinfo.html)

Ah, proof by 'fuck this shit!'. After all methods fail, i come crawling back to you.

What do you mean?

i think he means its his last resort...but i dont get why he crawls 'back'..that implies its if not the starting point of his methods then at least an intermediate one..giving up b4 having given up..thts like finding infinity on the way to infinity..

i think he means that his conclusion to previous quandaries is proof by fuck this shit

I see you know MIT engineers.

For some reason, every school I have attended... the engineers always managed to cause trouble. But I must admit, they sure did throw great parties ^_^

Or Stanford engineers also...

what about the notation of trigmetric functions? think about it how come cos^2(n)=(cos(n))^2
and cos^-1(n)doesnt= cos^(0-1)(n)
it makes no sense, am i right?

I use neither of those notations, I always write (cos(n))² and arccos(n), respectively.

the engineers at my uni tried to steal our massive pink neck tie...

Wait. UW?

Leave a comment

Comments temporarily disabled.



                                     



home     info     archive     contact     rss

Google+ Page   //   Facebook Page   //   Twitter Page






Welcome to Spiked Math!

Hello my fellow math geeks. My name is Mike and I am the creator of Spiked Math Comics, a math comic dedicated to humor, educate and entertain the geek in you. Beware though, there might be some math involved :D

New to Spiked Math?
View the top comics.

New Feature: Browse the archives in quick view! Choose from a black, white or grey background.