Yup, that's what it looks like.
155
Facebook Friends - January 25, 2010Rating: 4.5/5 (11 votes cast)
Yup, that's what it looks like.
Facebook Page // Twitter Page
16 Comments
Leave a comment
Profile pictures are tied to your email address and can
be set up at Gravatar.
Click here for recent comments.
(Note: You must have javascript enabled to leave comments, otherwise you will get a comment submission error.)
(Note: You must have javascript enabled to leave comments, otherwise you will get a comment submission error.)
Nor are the communative...
Argh--it must be Mnday. I can't even spelll. Much less remember my math facts.
Make that: Nor are they symmetric.
Isn't the a null function by definition symmetric?
Whats a mathmatician clowns favorite trick?
A Pi in the face!
(gotta make this a comic somehow lol)
Will it sting if I get pi in my i?
I imagine it would
Pi^i is messy
If you think, THAT is messy, what do you think i^pi is?
But e^πi is not messy at all--it negates everything...
Here you go, Ben:
http://mrburkemath.blogspot.com/2009/10/pie-in-face.html
Aww... someone needs a friendship request.
Nope.. this doesn't work..
If the result of making FB-relations transitive is as shown, the person must have at least one friend (other than himself).
If they were, we'd finally find out whether social networks are non-trivially partitioned. I always suspected there could be good probability, that such networks do not have only one weak component. Of course you are not supposed to count the isolated nodes ... like ... you know ... you.
Psychology Today: Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200911/why-your-friends-have-more-friends-you-do
(It also says something about your partner's sex partners...)
You need some imaginary friends -- http://xkcd.com/410/
But... but... the Mike class is implicitly friends with itself! It can't be 0.